Do You Really Know Your Business Partner?
Do you really know your business partner? Learn how background checks, public records research, and due diligence can help before you sign or invest.


Is hiring a private investigator during a custody battle legal in Texas? Learn what investigators can document, legal limits, and how evidence may help.
A child custody battle can be one of the most stressful legal situations a parent faces.
You may be concerned about where your child is spending time, whether the other parent is following a custody agreement, or whether certain activities could affect your child's safety.
But what if you cannot verify what is happening?
Can you legally hire someone to investigate the situation?
Yes. Hiring a private investigator during a custody battle is generally legal in Texas. However, the investigator must comply with state and federal laws, applicable court orders, and privacy restrictions.
A private investigator may be able to document relevant activities, conduct lawful surveillance, identify potential witnesses, and organize information for your attorney.
That does not mean investigators can secretly access private communications, trespass on property, or interfere with parenting time.
Understanding these boundaries is essential before beginning an investigation.
Texas law does not generally prohibit a parent from hiring a properly licensed private investigator because a custody dispute is underway.
Private investigative services are regulated under Texas Occupations Code Chapter 1702, which establishes licensing requirements for covered investigative activities.
The legality of a particular assignment depends on what the investigator is asked to do, how the information is collected, and whether any court orders restrict the proposed activity.
Depending on the circumstances, a parent may seek assistance with:
Documenting potential violations of a custody order.
Investigating specific child-safety concerns.
Verifying certain statements relevant to a custody dispute.
Identifying witnesses with relevant information.
Documenting observable activities through lawful surveillance.
Researching legally accessible records.
An investigator should evaluate whether the assignment serves a legitimate purpose and whether the proposed methods are lawful.
Hiring a private investigator does not give either parent additional custody rights or permission to disregard an existing court order.
It also does not authorize illegal surveillance, unauthorized electronic monitoring, or interference with the other parent's lawful possession of the child.
Parents may consider investigative assistance when they believe important facts are missing or cannot be independently verified.
Common concerns include inconsistent explanations about childcare arrangements, suspected violations of parenting schedules, or allegations of conduct that may affect a child's well-being.
A parent may question whether a child is being supervised appropriately during the other parent's scheduled parenting time.
One parent may believe that court-ordered exchanges or other possession provisions are not being followed.
A parent may have specific concerns about dangerous conduct or circumstances affecting the child.
Parents may receive contradictory information about an event and need help establishing what occurred.
Not every disagreement warrants surveillance or a formal investigation.
The strongest investigative assignments begin with a specific factual question that is relevant to the child's welfare or the court's orders.
A properly licensed investigator may use lawful investigative methods appropriate to the circumstances.
An investigator may document activities visible from places where the investigator is lawfully present, subject to privacy and other legal restrictions.
Certain court records and other legally accessible information may provide relevant background.
Investigators may contact individuals who voluntarily provide information about relevant events.
Lawfully obtained photographs or video may help establish observable facts.
A professional report may organize dates, times, observations, and supporting materials.
Investigators cannot compel witnesses to cooperate, access confidential records without authorization, or independently enforce custody orders.
Lawful surveillance of a parent may be possible when there is a legitimate investigative objective.
However, following someone is not automatically lawful in every circumstance.
The investigator must consider trespassing laws, stalking and harassment restrictions, privacy expectations, protective orders, and other applicable rules.
Depending on the circumstances, an investigator might document:
A parent arriving at a specified location.
The time of a custody exchange.
Observable conduct relevant to a specific concern.
The presence of individuals at a publicly observable location.
A photograph of a parent entering a business does not necessarily prove misconduct.
Similarly, observing a parent with another adult does not establish that the child is unsafe.
An investigator must distinguish direct observations from assumptions.
Potentially, yes.
A private investigator may assist with documenting events relevant to a custody order.
For example, a parent may report that scheduled exchanges repeatedly occur late or that another parent fails to appear.
An investigator should not assume that a reported disagreement constitutes a legal violation.
The relevant order must be reviewed by qualified legal counsel to determine the obligations it creates.
Depending on the assignment, lawful documentation may include the date, time, location, and observable circumstances of an exchange.
The court determines whether an enforceable order has been violated and what legal remedies may be available.
An investigator's observations may provide factual information, but they do not independently establish contempt or authorize a parent to withhold visitation.
Investigative assistance may sometimes be appropriate when there are specific, non-emergency concerns that can be examined lawfully.
However, suspected abuse or neglect requires special care.
If a child is in immediate danger, call 911.
Suspected child abuse or neglect should be reported to the appropriate authorities in accordance with Texas law. A private investigation should not delay reporting or emergency action.
An investigator may be able to record relevant observable facts without intruding on the child's privacy or interfering with an official investigation.
An investigator should not conduct coercive interviews with children, attempt to replace trained child-protection professionals, or take actions that risk contaminating a child's account.
When allegations involve abuse, legal counsel and the appropriate protective authorities should guide the response.
Lawfully obtained video may be useful when it accurately documents events relevant to a custody dispute.
However, recording laws and privacy restrictions still apply.
Certain activities visible from lawful observation points may be documented, subject to applicable legal limitations.
An investigator cannot assume that recording inside a private residence or other protected setting is lawful.
Audio recordings involve additional legal considerations. Texas generally permits certain recordings with consent from at least one party, but that does not authorize an investigator to intercept a private conversation in which no party has consented.
Federal and other states' laws may also apply.
Edited or selectively presented footage can create misleading impressions.
Professional documentation should preserve relevant context and distinguish observation from interpretation.
A custody dispute does not create unrestricted permission to install a tracking device.
Texas Penal Code Section 16.06 restricts installing tracking devices on motor vehicles owned or leased by another person and provides specific statutory defenses, including certain circumstances involving consent or court authorization.
Other privacy laws and court orders may also apply.
A parent should never assume that paying for a vehicle, previously sharing a vehicle, or being married to the driver automatically makes tracking lawful.
What we recommend: Do not install tracking devices or use another person's location-sharing account without obtaining qualified legal advice about the specific circumstances.
No investigative license provides blanket authority to access another person's private phone, messages, email, or password-protected accounts.
This includes attempting to obtain private communications through unauthorized account access or spyware.
Even when parents previously shared a device or account, the right to access particular communications may be limited.
A parent may be able to preserve communications they lawfully received, but should discuss their use and disclosure with counsel.
Unlawfully obtained information can create separate legal problems and may complicate the custody case.
Possibly.
Texas courts evaluate evidence under applicable rules concerning relevance, authentication, hearsay, and other requirements.
The fact that evidence was collected by a private investigator does not automatically make it admissible.
Texas Family Code Section 153.002 identifies the child's best interest as the primary consideration in decisions concerning conservatorship, possession, and access.
Depending on the facts, relevant information may concern a child's safety, a parent's conduct, compliance with court orders, or other circumstances bearing on the child's welfare.
An allegation of infidelity does not automatically determine custody.
The legal significance depends on whether the conduct is relevant to the child's best interests or another issue before the court.
An investigator may testify about firsthand observations when permitted under applicable procedural and evidentiary rules.
An attorney should evaluate how any findings may be presented.
Hiring an investigator is not inherently improper, but the way an investigation is conducted can create problems.
Trespassing, unauthorized tracking, hacking, or harassment may expose those involved to legal consequences.
Using an investigator primarily to intimidate or punish the other parent may undermine the legitimate purpose of the assignment.
Investigators should not obstruct exchanges, confront children, or interfere with lawful custody arrangements.
Presenting speculation as fact may damage credibility.
Protective orders, injunctions, and other court restrictions must be respected.
An investigation should support lawful fact-finding—not escalate parental conflict.
Yes, involving your family-law attorney early is generally advisable.
An attorney can help identify which facts are legally relevant and whether proposed investigative work could conflict with existing orders or litigation strategy.
Your attorney may help:
Define the investigative objective.
Review applicable custody orders.
Identify potential legal restrictions.
Determine what documentation may be useful.
Address evidence preservation.
Evaluate admissibility and discovery obligations.
Hiring an investigator through counsel does not automatically make every investigative record privileged or confidential.
The treatment of communications and work product depends on the applicable law and circumstances.
Costs depend on the investigative methods, scope, geographic area, and authorized hours.
A focused records inquiry may involve different expenses from surveillance covering multiple scheduled exchanges.
Clients should ask about the agency's billing structure, reporting fees, travel expenses, and procedures for authorizing additional work.
A professional investigator should avoid promising that a particular expenditure will produce evidence or change the court's decision.
The duration varies according to the investigative question.
Some matters may involve documenting a scheduled event.
Others may require research, witness interviews, or observations over an agreed period.
The investigation should be proportionate to the concern and any relevant legal deadlines.
A longer investigation does not necessarily mean a stronger case.
Before authorizing investigative work, parents should understand the agency's qualifications, proposed methods, and limitations.
Useful questions include:
Are you properly licensed to perform investigative services in Texas?
Have you handled investigations involving family-law matters?
What specific question would the investigation attempt to answer?
What methods would be lawful and appropriate?
How would you avoid interfering with my child or court-ordered parenting time?
What information would be included in the final report?
How would evidence be preserved?
How will fees and additional expenses be approved?
Can you coordinate appropriately with my attorney?
What results cannot be guaranteed?
An investigator should be prepared to explain limitations without promising a particular custody outcome.
Consider a hypothetical custody dispute involving two parents in the Houston area.
One parent reports that the other repeatedly arrives late for scheduled exchanges and sometimes provides conflicting explanations.
The concerned parent wants reliable documentation before discussing possible enforcement options with an attorney.
Rather than immediately recommending extensive surveillance, a responsible investigator would first seek to understand the specific factual question and any restrictions contained in the existing court order.
If an appropriate lawful assignment is authorized, the investigator might document a scheduled exchange from a permissible observation location.
The resulting report would describe what was actually observed, including relevant times and circumstances.
It would not automatically declare that the other parent committed contempt or that a custody modification is warranted.
Those are legal questions for counsel and the court.
This example illustrates an important distinction:
An investigator may document events, but the court determines their legal significance.
At TJS Private Investigations, we recognize that child custody disputes can involve strong emotions, conflicting accounts, and serious concerns about a child's welfare.
We believe professional investigative assistance should focus on legitimate factual questions rather than attempts to embarrass or retaliate against the other parent.
The child's safety and well-being should remain central.
Investigators must respect privacy, existing court orders, and the legal boundaries governing surveillance and information collection.
They should also recognize when an allegation requires immediate law enforcement or child-protection involvement rather than routine investigative work.
A professional report should accurately describe what was observed and acknowledge what remains uncertain.
What we recommend is to consult your family-law attorney, define a child-focused investigative objective, use only lawful methods, and prioritize reliable evidence over speculation.
The goal is not to win a personal dispute through surveillance.
It is to help establish facts that appropriate legal decision-makers can evaluate.
Know what to expect.
Generally, yes, in Texas. The investigative business and personnel must satisfy applicable licensing requirements, and the assignment must comply with relevant laws and court orders.
Lawful surveillance may be possible, but privacy, trespassing, stalking, harassment, and court-order restrictions apply.
Yes, an investigator may document observable events relevant to a custody order. Whether those events constitute a legal violation is determined through the appropriate legal process.
Photography involving children requires particular care and must comply with applicable privacy laws and court orders. The investigator should avoid intrusive or unsafe conduct.
Not without appropriate lawful authority. Hiring an investigator does not authorize hacking or unauthorized access to private communications.
Only when legally permitted. Texas law restricts vehicle tracking and provides specific statutory conditions and defenses.
The appropriate timing depends on the circumstances. Consulting a family-law attorney first can help ensure that investigative work is relevant and lawful.
Improper surveillance, harassment, unlawful information gathering, or interference with court orders may create legal and credibility problems.
Tell us what you need to know.
When concerns about your child's welfare or compliance with a custody agreement leave important questions unanswered, accurate information can help you and your attorney evaluate the situation.
At TJS Private Investigations, we believe custody-related inquiries deserve discretion, lawful investigative methods, careful documentation, and a child-focused approach.
If you are considering professional investigative assistance during a custody dispute, contact TJS Private Investigations to discuss your concerns and determine whether appropriate investigative options may be available.
TJS Private Investigations
Facts. Evidence. Answers.

[Let’s talk about your case]
Your next step starts with answers.
Tell us what’s happening and what you need to know. We’ll listen, explain how an investigation could help, and discuss an approach that fits your situation.
Copyright © 2026 TJS Private Investigations. All rights reserved.