Can a Private Investigator Investigate Insurance Fraud?
Can a private investigator investigate insurance fraud? Learn how lawful surveillance, witness interviews, and evidence gathering support Texas claims with TJSPI.


How do private investigators conduct surveillance? Learn about legal observation, video evidence, investigation planning, and Texas laws with TJSPI.
Surveillance is one of the most recognizable services associated with private investigations.
Television and movies often portray investigators following subjects through crowded streets, taking photographs from hidden locations, and uncovering important secrets within hours.
Professional investigative surveillance is considerably more structured.
An investigator must understand the assignment, evaluate the information available, identify lawful observation opportunities, and document relevant activities accurately.
Surveillance also involves uncertainty. Subjects may change their routines, travel unexpectedly, or engage in no activity relevant to the investigation.
This leads to an important question: How do private investigators conduct surveillance, and what can the process actually reveal?
The answer depends on the investigative objective, the circumstances, and the legal restrictions governing observation and evidence collection.
At TJS Private Investigations, we believe clients should understand both the capabilities and limitations of professional surveillance before authorizing an assignment.
Private investigator surveillance is the lawful observation and documentation of activities relevant to a legitimate investigative purpose.
It may involve observing a person's movements, documenting interactions, or recording activities that can legally be viewed from an appropriate location.
Surveillance is not automatically appropriate simply because a client wants to know what another person is doing.
The assignment must have a legitimate purpose, and the proposed methods must comply with applicable laws.
Surveillance may be considered in matters involving:
Suspected infidelity or relationship concerns.
Child custody and family-related disputes.
Certain insurance or civil claims.
Employee misconduct or suspected workplace theft.
Litigation support.
Other legitimate investigative matters requiring factual observation.
The methods used should be selected according to the question the investigation is intended to answer.
Professional surveillance is about documenting relevant facts, not monitoring someone without a defined purpose.
Effective surveillance begins with an assessment of the client's information and objectives.
An investigator may review known details about the subject, relevant locations, and the specific circumstances requiring observation.
The investigator should identify the central question.
For example, a client may want to determine whether an individual visits a particular location during a recurring absence.
That is a more focused objective than asking an investigator to observe everything the individual does indefinitely.
Depending on the assignment, useful information may include:
Accurate identifying details.
Known vehicle descriptions.
Relevant schedules.
Locations associated with the concern.
Dates or times of reported activity.
Information about previous observations.
Relevant documents lawfully possessed by the client.
The investigator should evaluate the accuracy of the information rather than assume every detail is correct.
Before surveillance begins, the investigator should consider whether the proposed activities can be performed lawfully and safely.
Private investigators do not receive special authority to trespass, enter private residences, or disregard privacy laws.
Surveillance methods vary depending on the circumstances and applicable legal restrictions.
Stationary surveillance involves observing relevant activity from an appropriate fixed location.
For example, an investigator may document arrivals or departures at a location where observation is lawful.
The investigator must consider visibility, safety, privacy, and the limitations of the observation point.
Mobile surveillance involves observing relevant movements between locations when doing so is lawful and safe.
Traffic, road conditions, visibility, and changes in the subject's activities can affect the continuity of observation.
Investigators should not endanger the public or violate traffic laws to maintain surveillance.
Photographs and video may help preserve observable activities.
However, the legality of recording depends on the circumstances, including location, privacy expectations, and applicable law.
In some assignments, lawful records research may help clarify identifying details or relevant locations before fieldwork.
Research findings must be verified and should not be treated as conclusive merely because they appear in a database.
Following someone does not mean an investigator has unlimited authority to monitor that individual.
Private investigators must operate within the law and avoid conduct that constitutes harassment, stalking, trespassing, or other prohibited activity.
Certain activities observable from places where an investigator is lawfully present may be documented.
However, being in a public place does not automatically make every form of surveillance lawful.
The method, duration, purpose, and applicable privacy or anti-stalking laws can affect the legal analysis.
Investigators cannot enter restricted property without lawful authority.
They also cannot enter private residences or other protected spaces merely because the client requests information about activities occurring inside.
Surveillance should never involve reckless driving, dangerous maneuvers, or confrontations intended to provoke a reaction.
Losing visual contact with a subject may be preferable to creating a safety risk.
What we recommend: Choose an investigator who can explain surveillance limitations and who does not promise to maintain uninterrupted observation under every circumstance.
Professional surveillance may involve ordinary photographic, video, and documentation equipment.
The equipment selected depends on the assignment and the legal conditions under which it will be used.
Cameras may document observable activities when recording is lawful.
The usefulness of the resulting material depends on image clarity, context, accurate identification, and preservation.
Written or electronic logs may record observations, relevant times, locations, and changes in activity.
These records help establish a chronological account of what occurred.
Where multiple authorized investigators are involved, communication equipment may support coordination.
The use of any device must comply with applicable law.
GPS tracking is frequently misunderstood.
A private investigator's license does not automatically authorize placing a tracking device on someone's vehicle or monitoring their location electronically.
Tracking may implicate Texas Penal Code Section 16.06, federal law, privacy rights, consent, and other legal considerations.
Investigators should not use tracking devices without an appropriate legal basis.
Surveillance can establish certain observable facts.
For example, photographs or video may document that an individual arrived at a location, met another person, or engaged in a particular visible activity.
However, surveillance cannot necessarily establish why an activity occurred or what happened outside the investigator's view.
Consider an investigator who documents two people meeting at a restaurant.
The observation may establish that the individuals were together at a particular place and time.
It does not automatically establish an intimate relationship, financial arrangement, or improper conduct.
A brief recording may omit events that occurred before or after the documented activity.
Professional reporting should explain significant limitations rather than present isolated footage as a complete account.
When appropriate, additional lawful information may help verify an observation.
The purpose is to improve reliability, not to force evidence into a predetermined interpretation.
The strongest investigative findings are those that can be accurately explained and supported.
Infidelity surveillance may be requested when a client has specific concerns about a spouse's or partner's activities.
An investigator may document relevant observable movements, meetings, or activities during an authorized observation period.
Surveillance may reveal information that supports a concern, contradicts an assumption, or leaves the question unresolved.
The investigator cannot guarantee that suspected conduct will occur during the assignment.
A defined observation period based on reliable information may provide a more focused investigative objective.
However, a predictable schedule does not guarantee meaningful findings.
Investigators should document what occurred without exaggerating the meaning of interactions.
A meeting between two people is not necessarily proof of infidelity.
Certain child custody matters may involve concerns about supervision, safety, or compliance with court-ordered arrangements.
Lawful surveillance may help document observable activities relevant to specific questions.
However, these assignments require particular sensitivity because children may be involved.
Investigative methods should avoid unnecessary intrusion into children's lives.
The presence of a child does not eliminate applicable privacy protections.
When surveillance is intended for litigation, legal counsel can help identify the factual issues that may be relevant.
An investigator cannot determine whether a parent is legally fit or guarantee a custody outcome.
If a child may be in immediate danger, emergency services should be contacted.
Suspected abuse or neglect should be reported as required by applicable law. Surveillance should not delay protective action.
Businesses may consider surveillance when specific concerns arise about misconduct, unauthorized activity, or possible misuse of company property.
However, employer authority has limits.
Surveillance involving employees may implicate privacy, labor, employment, and recording laws.
An employer's ownership of a workplace does not automatically authorize every form of monitoring.
A clearly defined allegation helps establish whether surveillance is appropriate.
For example, an inventory discrepancy may warrant initial records review before field surveillance is considered.
An investigator should not assume that an employee's unusual activity establishes wrongdoing.
Observations must be interpreted in the context of job responsibilities, company policies, and other relevant facts.
Private investigative services in Texas are regulated under Texas Occupations Code Chapter 1702 and related requirements administered by the Texas Department of Public Safety.
However, compliance with licensing requirements is only one part of conducting lawful surveillance.
Investigators must also comply with applicable privacy, trespassing, harassment, recording, and other laws.
Texas generally follows a one-party-consent framework for certain recordings, but that does not authorize an investigator to intercept conversations to which no consenting party is involved.
Federal law and the laws of other jurisdictions may also apply.
An investigator cannot enter private property or protected spaces without lawful authority.
Conduct that constitutes stalking or harassment is not excused by holding an investigative license.
Private investigators cannot hack accounts, intercept protected communications, or access confidential information without appropriate authorization.
What we recommend: Verify licensing and ask prospective investigators how they evaluate legal limitations before conducting surveillance.
Surveillance assignments vary in duration.
Some involve a defined observation period lasting several hours.
Others require multiple periods of observation because the relevant activity is unpredictable or the investigative objective is more complex.
The timeline may be affected by:
The subject's schedule.
The location and geographic area.
The type of activity being investigated.
The information available before surveillance.
Legal and practical restrictions.
The need for additional documentation.
An investigator should explain the proposed scope and reassess whether further surveillance is justified as information develops.
Surveillance costs depend on the number of investigators, authorized hours, travel requirements, geographic scope, and reporting arrangements.
Agencies may charge hourly rates, require retainers, or use other agreed fee structures.
Clients should ask whether expenses such as mileage, travel time, or reporting are included.
A focused investigative objective can help avoid unnecessary hours.
However, surveillance remains unpredictable.
The investigator cannot control the subject's activities or guarantee a particular result.
Clients should clarify the billing structure, proposed observation periods, deliverables, and process for approving additional work.
Professional transparency is more valuable than a promise of guaranteed results.
Consider a hypothetical situation involving a client who believes an individual is regularly visiting a particular location during an unexplained absence.
The client asks an investigator to document the person's activities.
A poorly defined assignment might involve observation without a clear question or a realistic plan.
A more disciplined approach would begin by evaluating the client's information, identifying the relevant period, and determining whether lawful surveillance could establish useful facts.
During the assignment, the subject might visit the suspected location—or follow an entirely ordinary routine.
Either result must be documented accurately.
If the investigator observes a meeting, the report should describe the interaction without automatically assigning a motive.
If no relevant activity occurs, the report should explain the observations and limitations.
Professional surveillance is not measured by how dramatic the findings appear. It is measured by the reliability of the information obtained and the accuracy of its documentation.
At TJS Private Investigations, we believe this distinction should guide client expectations.
At TJS Private Investigations, we recognize that clients often consider surveillance because they need answers to questions that ordinary research or personal observation has not resolved.
Those questions may involve personal relationships, family concerns, legal matters, or business operations.
We believe professional surveillance should begin with a legitimate objective and a realistic assessment of what observation may accomplish.
The investigator's responsibility is not to confirm the client's suspicions.
It is to document relevant activities lawfully and report what the evidence actually establishes.
Surveillance may produce photographs, video, activity logs, or other useful observations.
It may also produce limited or inconclusive results.
Both possibilities should be discussed before work begins.
What we recommend is to prioritize clear investigative objectives, lawful methods, careful documentation, realistic budgets, and objective interpretation of findings.
Professional surveillance should help clients make informed decisions based on facts rather than assumptions.
Know what to expect.
Private investigators conduct surveillance by planning an authorized assignment, observing relevant activities through lawful methods, documenting what occurs, and preparing factual reports.
Lawful observation may be possible in certain circumstances. However, investigators must comply with privacy, trespassing, stalking, harassment, traffic, and other applicable laws.
Some recording methods may be lawful in particular circumstances, but concealed recording raises significant privacy and legal considerations. An investigative license does not authorize unrestricted hidden-camera use.
An investigative license does not authorize unauthorized access to a person's phone or location data
GPS tracking may be restricted by Texas and federal law. The legality depends on the circumstances and any applicable authorization or exceptions.
Photography may be lawful in appropriate circumstances, but the location, method, privacy expectations, and applicable laws matter.
There is no standard duration. Some assignments involve a limited observation period, while others require multiple sessions.
Lawfully obtained surveillance footage may be admissible when it satisfies applicable evidentiary requirements. Admission is not guaranteed.
No. Investigators cannot control a subject's activities or guarantee that relevant conduct will occur during an assignment.
Tell us what you need to know.
When important decisions depend on accurate information, professional surveillance may help document relevant activities and clarify unresolved questions.
At TJS Private Investigations, we believe surveillance assignments should be approached with discretion, lawful methods, careful planning, and reliable reporting.
Whether your concerns involve suspected infidelity, a family-related matter, workplace misconduct, or litigation support, we invite you to discuss your circumstances and determine whether professional surveillance may be appropriate.
TJS Private Investigations
Facts. Evidence. Answers.

[Let’s talk about your case]
Your next step starts with answers.
Tell us what’s happening and what you need to know. We’ll listen, explain how an investigation could help, and discuss an approach that fits your situation.
Copyright © 2026 TJS Private Investigations. All rights reserved.